My Photo

About Me

  • Hello you. I'm a 38-year old MSc student, studying Advanced Computer Science at Sussex University. I'm especially interested in Internet and mobile software, sensors and pervasive computing, user interfaces, and the process of developing great software.

    Before that I spent 11 years running Future Platforms, a software company I co-founded which makes lovely things for mobile phones, and which I sold in 2011.

    I read a lot, write here, and practice Aikido and airsoft. I live in Brighton, a seaside town on the south coast of the UK, with two cats and a clown.

AdSense

Stalk Me

  • Email me:
    twhume at gmail dot com
Blog powered by TypePad

« MobUp | Main | Warrenellis.com No Good Today »

July 11, 2006

Comments

Mr Ribot

I think this could also be due to a number of other factors:

The WAP push is normally the final step before the real transaction is started and should indicate the cost of the service / application the user is requesting. The user may not have previously known the cost or may second question themselves as to if they wish to spend money on the requested service.

WAP push messages are quite strictly limited in length and often appear quite harsh in terms of content, but on the other hand gets straight to the point. They can be made more friendly by having a "WAP Service message name" e.g. "Future Platforms" rather than coming from a number e.g. 83010.

That said, I think that a combination of incorrect internet settings , service inboxes and previous exprerience of mass mailed WAP Push marketing campaigns will probably have had a larger detrimental effect.

It increases the cost, but what about sending out an SMS as well as the WAP Push?

The comments to this entry are closed.